MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049176011 · doi:10.4161/cc.9.22.14047

Same partners, different dance: Involvement of DNA replication proteins in centrosome regulation

2010· review· en· W2049176011 on OpenAlexfundno aff
James Knockleby, Hoyun Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Cycle · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsBiologyDNA replication factor CDT1Pre-replication complexOrigin recognition complexControl of chromosome duplicationCentrosomeMinichromosome maintenanceDNA re-replicationEukaryotic DNA replicationLicensing factorDNA replicationCell biologyGeneticsReplication factor CCell cycleGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Genome replication is the most fundamental element of the continuity of life. In eukaryotes, DNA replication is regulated by an elegant network of many different protein factors to ensure the timely and accurate copying of their entire genome once per cell cycle. The replication factors include the maintenance (MCM) proteins, Cdt1, Cdc6, Cdc7, Cdc45, and geminin. All of these proteins are involved in the regulation of DNA replication at the initiation step. Interestingly, recent studies have shown that some of these replication proteins also localize to the centrosome, often throughout the entire cell cycle. These centrosomally localized replication proteins appear to play essential roles in the regulation of centrosome biogenesis, suggesting that genome replication and segregation are regulated interdependently. In this review, we summarize and discuss the inter-dependent regulation played by some of the replication proteins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.908
Threshold uncertainty score0.837

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell CycleSame topicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsFrench-language works237,207