MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049179731 · doi:10.1086/374218

The Initial Helium Content of Galactic Globular Cluster Stars from the<i>R</i>‐Parameter: Comparison with the Cosmic Microwave Background Constraint

2003· article· en· W2049179731 on OpenAlexaff
S. Cassisi, M. Salaris, Alan W. Irwin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCosmic microwave backgroundGlobular clusterAstrophysicsPhysicsStarsMetallicityNucleosynthesisBig Bang nucleosynthesisCOSMIC cancer databaseAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent precise determinations of the primordial He-abundance (Y_p) from cosmic microwave background (CMB) analyses and cosmological nucleosynthesis computations, provide Y_p=0.248$\pm$0.001. On the other hand, recent works on the initial He-abundance of Galactic globular cluster (GGC) stars, making use of the R parameter as He-indicator, have consistently obtained $Y_{GGC}\sim$0.20. In light of this serious discrepancy that casts doubt on the adequacy of low mass He-burning stellar models, we have rederived the initial He-abundance for stars in two large samples of GGCs, by employing theoretical models computed using new and more accurate determinations of the Equation of State for the stellar matter, and of the uncertain $^{12}$C$(\alpha,\gamma)^{16}$O reaction rate. Our models include semiconvection during the central convective He-burning phase, while the breathing pulses are suppressed, in agreement with the observational constraints coming from the measurements of the R_2 parameter in a sample of clusters. By taking into account the observational errors on the individual R-parameter values, as well as uncertainties in the GGC [Fe/H] scale, treatment of convection and $^{12}$C$(\alpha,\gamma)^{16}$O reaction rate, we have obtained, respectively, a mean $Y_{GGC}$=0.243$\pm$0.006 and $Y_{GGC}$=0.244$\pm$0.006 for the two studied GGC samples. These estimates are now fully consistent with Y_p obtained from CMB studies. Moreover, the trend of the individual He-abundances with respect to [Fe/H] is consistent with no appreciable He-enrichment along the GGC metallicity range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.756

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations167
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207