Carbon dioxide-induced liberation of methane from laboratory-formed methane hydrates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper reports a laboratory mimic study that focused on the extraction of methane (CH4) from hydrates coupled with sequestration of carbon dioxide (CO2) as hydrates, by taking advantage of preferential thermodynamic stability of hydrates of CO2 over CH4. Five hydrate formation-decomposition runs focused on CH4–CO2 exchange, two baselines and three with host sediments, were performed in a 200 mL high-pressure Jerguson cell fitted with two glass windows that allowed visualization of the time-resolved hydrate phenomenon. The baseline pure hydrates formed from artificial seawater (75 mL) under 6400–6600 kPa CH4 or 2800–3200 kPa CO2 (hydrate forming regime), when the bath temperature was maintained within 4–6 °C and the gas/liquid volumetric ratio was ∼1.7:1 in the water-excess systems. The data show that the induction time for hydrate appearance was largest at 96 h with CH4, while with CO2 the time shortened by a factor of four. However, when the secondary gas (CO2 or CH4) was injected into the system containing preformed hydrates, the entering gas formed the hydrate phase instantly (within minutes) and no lag was observed. In a system containing host Ottawa sand (104 g) and artificial seawater (38 mL), the induction period reduced to 24 h. In runs with multiple charges, the extent of hydrate formation reached 44% of the theoretical value in the water-excess system, whereas the value maximized at 23% in the gas-excess system. The CO2 hydrate formation in a system that already contained CH4 hydrates was facile and they remained stable, whereas CH4 hydrate formation in a system consisting of CO2 hydrates as hosts were initially stable, but CH4 gas in hydrates quickly exchanged with free CO2 gas to form more stable CO2 hydrates. In all five runs, even though the system was depressurized, left for over a week at room temperature, and flushed with nitrogen gas in between runs, hydrates exhibited the “memory effect”, irrespective of the gas used, a result in contradiction with that reported previously in the literature. The facile CH4–CO2 exchange observed under temperature and pressure conditions that mimic naturally occurring CH4 hydrates show promise to develop a commercial carbon sequestration system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".