MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049199300 · doi:10.1109/indicon.2014.7030621

Parallelization of FDM/FEM computation for PDEs on PARAM YUVA-II cluster of Xeon Phi coprocessors

2014· article· en· W2049199300 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sonia Rani, Vudutala China V. Rao, Samrit Kumar Maity, Krishan Gopal Gupta

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsXeon PhiParallel computingCoprocessorComputer scienceFinite element methodComputational scienceComputationXeonMessage Passing InterfaceMessage passingAlgorithmPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses an efficient implementation of finite difference method (FDM) and finite element method (FEM) computations for Partial Differential Equation (Poisson Equation) on a message passing cluster with Intel Xeon Phi coprocessors[6,15]. We have performed computations on PARAM YUVA-II [9] which is a message passing cluster with compute nodes as Xeon multi-core processors and Xeon Phi coprocessors [6,15,17-19]. A combination of OpenMP [4] and MPI [5,19,20] is used for structured grid FDM computations. The unstructured triangular and hexahedral meshes and graph partitioning software METIS [10] are used in FEM computations. The Jacobi iterative method is used to solve resulting matrix system of linear equations. A detailed performance analysis of optimizations on Xeon Phi coprocessor using OpenMP and MPI framework are presented. Our experiments indicate that MPI-OpenMP codes on FDM computations achieve 2X to 3X speed-ups for large mesh sizes. The FEM implementation has shown marginal improvement in speed-up on Xeon Phi Cluster.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.500
Threshold uncertainty score0.429

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational MathematicsFrench-language works237,207