MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049199750 · doi:10.1142/s0217732305017202

EXPERIMENTAL TESTS OF TIME DILATION IN SPECIAL RELATIVITY

2005· article· en· W2049199750 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Physics Letters A · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTime dilationPhysicsInertial frame of referenceSpecial relativityTwin paradoxLorentz transformationTheoretical physicsKinematicsTheory of relativityTests of special relativityTest theories of special relativityGeneral relativityOne-way speed of lightReference frameClassical mechanicsDilation (metric space)Frame (networking)Four-forceGeometryComputer scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A review of experimental tests of time dilation in special relativity is given, with an emphasis on the recent heavy-ion storage-ring work, currently the most sensitive method. The experimental results are evaluated in the context of the kinematic test theories of Robertson and Mansouri and Sexl, which assume the existence of a preferred inertial reference frame. Prospects for future improvements and the sensitivity of time dilation experiments to Lorentz and CPT violating extensions of the standard model are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.163
Threshold uncertainty score0.482

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it