MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049250959 · doi:10.1353/his.0.0064

A Social History of Spanish Labour: New Perspectives on Class, Politics and Gender (review)

2009· article· en· W2049250959 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Francisco Javier Caspistegui

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire sociale · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSpanish History and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoriographyDictatorshipIdeologyPoliticsSocial history (medicine)Cultural historyHistoryComparative historyPolitical historyGender studiesSociologyDiversity (politics)Gender historyClassicsSocial sciencePolitical scienceEconomic historyLawDemocracyAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: A Social History of Spanish Labour: New Perspectives on Class, Politics and Gender Francisco J. Caspistegui Piqueras, José A., and Vicent Sanz Rozalén (eds.) —A Social History of Spanish Labour: New Perspectives on Class, Politics and Gender. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2007. Pp. 330. Until recently, it has been difficult to recognize how normal Spain is in comparison with the rest of Europe. Its cliched image, nineteenth-century Romanticism, and Franco's long dictatorship gave rise to almost insurmountable obstacles in the process of examining the history of Spain using European guidelines. Much the same is true of its social history and particularly of its labour history, which, in fact, as the editors of this collective volume underline, did not appear as such until the last gasps of the dictatorship in the early 1970s. Even then, as the introduction to the historiographical review states, the weight of ideologization in reaction to the dearth of freedom hindered historiography, and only in the early 1980s did it begin to shake off its ideological dead weight. In fact, the articles that make up this volume bring together academic writings starting in the 1990s, a fact [End Page 259] reflected in the authors' profiles. But the articles also show a good balance between theoretical and methodological reflection (Pé rez Ledesma, Pérez Fuentes, Paniagua, and Casanova) and empirical analysis (in the remainder); they focus on Spanish regional diversity, which is of such importance in the history of the country and in the particular forms of its labour structure. Thus there are articles dealing with work in Catalonia, the Basque Country, Andalusia, Valencia, Castelló n, Madrid, Asturias, and Aragó n, without omitting the generic Spanish framework as they touch on the creation of a radical culture under the shelter of the First International, the Civil War, the Franco era, or revolutionary ideas in diverse organizations. Moreover, the presence of women is seen in two specific articles (Pé rez Fuentes and Sarasú a) and also in all the other texts as a gauge of that sensitivity that is becoming more common in Spanish historiography. Finally, as a sample of the diversity of the 15 texts, there is a review of labour issues from the mid-nineteenth century to the end of Francoism, although the Restoration period (1875–1923) predominates. All in all, this selection of works is a clear reflection of the evolution of historiography, including that of Spain, towards perspectives that give precedence to a cultural and anthropological vision. Indeed, the attention paid to language (without scaling postmodern heights) is revealing. The initial reflection by Pérez Ledesma is especially important, as he emphasizes the language used, first because it gives shape to the experiences and secondly because, when nothing existed with which to define or refer to social structure and its components, it was impossible to be aware of belonging. His analysis of the core process of words such as exploitation or emancipation shows a route that is close to the history of concepts. This is no exception, as other authors show the importance that words acquired in the development of an identity and in the shaping of the tools used to perceive a changing reality. Uría, for example, analyses the changing perception of words like riches or profit among the mixed workers of Asturias, and Paniagua examines the different concepts of revolution among Republicans, Socialists, and Anarchists. Apart from language, the above-mentioned attention to anthropology and popular culture must be emphasized, as an attempt to limit the distance between time spent working and time spent not working by examining a social group rather than an activity. This can be seen in the use of literary texts, such as the references to La forja de un rebelde by Arturo Barea in the study of Madrid washerwomen, or a reference to Joaquín Dicenta in the context of the Linares miners. In short, this interest is reflected in explicit references to the British model embodied by E. P. Thompson as well as more critical references to E. Hobsbawm. We must also emphasize the focus on daily life, such as the material conditions and morals of the Biscay miners...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.012
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistoire socialeSame topicSpanish History and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207