Natural Gas Hydrate Formation and Decomposition in the Presence of Kinetic Inhibitors. 1. High Pressure Calorimetry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of kinetic inhibitors, both chemical (PVP and H1W85281) and biological (type III antifreeze protein), on natural gas hydrate formation was investigated using high pressure differential scanning calorimetry (HP-DSC). The presence of inhibitors decreased the overall formation of methane/ethane/propane hydrate compared to systems without added inhibitors. As well, all of the inhibitors significantly delayed hydrate nucleation as compared to water controls. However, the two classes of inhibitors were distinguished by the formation of hydrates with different stabilities. A single hydrate melting peak was seen with the antifreeze protein (AFP), and this was consistent after recrystallization. In contrast, multiple hydrate melting events, some indicating the formation of hydrate structures with high stability, were observed in the presence of the chemical inhibitors, and these varied depending on the crystallization cycle. This heterogeneity suggests that the use of these chemical inhibitors (PVP and H1W85281) may present a special challenge to operators depending upon the gas mixture and environmental conditions and that AFPs may offer a more predictable, efficacious solution in these cases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".