Microstructures formed by directional solidification of two ternary eutectic alloys of Bi–Cd–In system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Microstructures of the two ternary eutectic alloys of the Bi–Cd–In system were studied using slow unidirectional solidification, followed by quenching to form a representative solid/liquid interface for subsequent observation. The eutectic reactions were found to take the form L↔BiIn+BiIn2+Cd at 77.5°C and L↔BiIn2+ɛ+Cd at 61.5°C. The 77.5°C eutectic was observed to be of the faceted (BiIn)–faceted (Cd)–non-faceted (BiIn2) type, while all three phases of the 61.5°C eutectic showed faceting. The BiIn and BiIn2 phases of the 77.5°C eutectic formed a quasiregular microstructure with the Cd phase growing relatively independently. The phases of the 61.5°C eutectic tended to form a lamellar microstructure with a BiIn2–ɛ–Cd–ɛ–BiIn2 phase sequence. Both eutectics were observed to obey the usual phase spacing law, λ2R=constant, where λ is the phase spacing and R is the growth rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".