In vitro Manipulation of Rumen Fermentation Efficiency by Fumaric acid – Bentonite Coupled Addition as an Alternative to Antibiotics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Short term in vitro incubations were used to evaluate the effect of fumaric acid - bentonite coupled addition onrumen fermentation effeciency. Ruminal contents from five steers were used for preparation of inoculums ofmixed rumen microorganisms that were used in generatation of three treatment systems, negative control,fumaric acid treated, and fumaric acid – bentonite coupled treated. The fermentation pattern revealed that, thiscoupled addition was associated with an additional increase in propionic acid production and fermentationefficiency and was related to an additional decrease in methanogenesis and VFAs utilization index. Furthermore,it increased total VFAs concentrations and decreased pH value, ammonia nitrogen (NH3–N) concentrations andbutyrate proportions. Meanwhile, it did not alter the proportions of long chain VFAs or cellulase activity.Conclusively, this coupled addition would improve the impact of fumaric acid on rumen fermentation patternand can be appropriate alternative for antibiotic feed additives in improving ruminants feed efficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".