MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049421464

Regulation of NRAMP1 gene expression by 1alpha,25-dihydroxy-vitamin D(3) in HL-60 phagocytes.

2002· article· en· W2049421464 on OpenAlexaff
E A Roig, Étienne Richer, François Canonne‐Hergaux, Philippe Gros, Mathieu Cellier

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVitamin D Research Studies
Canadian institutionsArmand Frappier MuseumInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyMolecular biologyTranscription (linguistics)Gene expressionTransfectionMessenger RNAPromoterRegulation of gene expressionTranscription factorGeneBiochemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The natural resistance-associated macrophage protein 1 (Nramp1) is a proton-dependent transporter of divalent metals. We studied NRAMP1 expression during HL-60 differentiation induced by VD and VD agonists. NRAMP1 and CD14 gene expression differed in kinetics of induction, mRNA levels and stability, and response to VD combined with PMA, whereas a combination of VD and IFN-gamma induced similar up-regulation. NRAMP1 protein expression paralleled the accumulation of mRNA and was localized in the phagosomal membrane after phagocytosis. A promoter construct extending 647 bp upstream of NRAMP1 ATG showed myeloid-specific transcription in transient transfection assays, which was up-regulated by VD in HL-60. In HL-60 clones stably transfected with this construct, transcription was apparently induced through indirect VD genomic effects, and there was accordance between the levels of reporter transcription and endogenous NRAMP1 mRNA in response to VD but not to IFN-gamma. Thus, VD genomic effects stimulate NRAMP1 transcription and protein expression in maturing phagocytes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicVitamin D Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207