MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2049448088 · doi:10.4212/cjhp.v66i5.1294

Acting on Adherence: Better Sooner than Later

2013· article· en· W2049448088 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Silva Vujanovic

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Physical Compatibility of Ranitidine and Metoclopramide in 50-mL Minibags of Normal SalineRanitidine and metoclopramide are routinely given intravenously before surgical procedures that involve spinal or general anesthesia.Recently, another institution contacted our institution to request stability data to support the practice of routinely mixing ranitidine 50 mg and metoclopramide 10 mg in a 50-mL minibag of normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride) for IV administration before cesarean section.Before receiving this request, we had been unaware of this practice and assumed that these medications were to be administered either concurrently via the Y-site connector or consecutively.However, when questioned about the administration of these 2 medications, the nursing staff unanimously reported that this practice had been followed for more than 5 years on our institution's maternity ward, as well as in the adult surgical daycare unit.The authors contacted other large maternity centres in the region and discovered only one other site that was mixing ranitidine and metoclopramide before administration.Commonly used compatibility references, including Trissel's handbook 1 and the King Guide, 2 were reviewed, a literature search was performed, and site-specific policies were reviewed for information about the specific combination of ranitidine 50 mg and metoclopramide 10 mg in 50 mL of normal saline; however, no stability or compatibility data were found.Ranitidine and metoclopramide are reported to be physically compatible at the Y-site connector and when combined in a syringe (without normal saline).1,2 In addition, in a study first published in 2010, Cabrera and others 3 evaluated the chemical and physical compatibility of an admixture containing 4 medications (ranitidine 150 mg, metoclopramide 50 mg, tramadol 500 mg, and ketorolac 150 mg in normal saline) stored at room temperature for 48 h, because this admixture was to be infused over 48 h for pain control.The authors found no change in colour, formation of precipitate, or phase separation.When the mean concentration of each drug was tested at 48 h, metoclopramide remained between 100% and 105% of its initial level and ranitidine between 99% and 102% of its initial level.We conducted a small physical compatibility study by preparing a bag of ranitidine 50 mg (25 mg/mL; GlaxoSmith Kline, lot C618668, expiry August 2014) and metoclopramide 10 mg (10 mg/2 mL; Sandoz, lot CX8994, expiry October 2015) in 50 mL of normal saline (Baxter, lot W3E07C0, expiry May 2014).This admixture was left at room temperature (about 25°C) for 72 h.The bag was assessed at 1, 17, 26, 41, and 72 h; at each time point, there was no visible evidence of colour

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy→Same topicAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare→French-language works237,207→