Different extrinsic trophic factors regulate neurite outgrowth and synapse formation between identifiedLymnaea neurons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The requirement for trophic factors in neurite outgrowth is well established, though their role in synapse formation is yet to be determined. Moreover, the issue of whether the trophic factors mediating neurite outgrowth are also responsible for synapse specification has not yet been resolved. To test whether trophic factors mediating neurite outgrowth and synapse formation between identified neurons are conserved in two molluscan species and whether these developmental processes are differentially regulated by different trophic factors, we used soma-soma and neurite-neurite synapses between identified Lymnaea neurons. We demonstrate here that the trophic factors present in Aplysia hemolymph, although sufficient to induce neurite outgrowth from Lymnaea neurons, do not promote specific synapse formation between excitatory partners. Specifically, the identified presynaptic neuron visceral dorsal 4 (VD4) and postsynaptic neuron left pedal dorsal 1 (LPeD1) were either paired in a soma-soma configuration or plated individually to allow neuritic contacts. Cells were cultured in either Lymnaea brain-conditioned medium (CM) or on poly-L-lysine dishes that were pretreated with Aplysia hemolymph (ApHM), but contained only Lymnaea defined medium (DM; does not promote neurite outgrowth). In ApHM-coated dishes containing DM, Lymnaea neurons exhibited extensive neurite outgrowth, but appropriate excitatory synapses failed to develop between the cells. Instead, inappropriate reciprocal inhibitory synapses formed between VD4 and LPeD1. Similar inappropriate inhibitory synapses were observed in Aplysia hemolymph-pretreated dishes that contained dialyzed Aplysia hemolymph. These inhibitory synapses were novel and inappropriate, because they do not exist in vivo. A receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (Lavendustin A) blocked neurite outgrowth induced by both Lymnaea CM and ApHM. However, it did not affect inappropriate inhibitory synapse formation between the neurons. These data demonstrate that neurite outgrowth but not inappropriate inhibitory synapse formation involves receptor tyrosine kinases. Together, our data provide direct evidence that trophic factors required for neurite outgrowth are conserved among two different molluscan species, and that neurite extension and synapse specification between excitatory partners are likely mediated by different trophic factors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".