MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049463780 · doi:10.1353/jer.0.0094

The Atlantic Enlightenment (review)

2009· article· en· W2049463780 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rosemarie Zagarri

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Early Republic · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicColonialism, slavery, and trade
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnlightenmentAtlantic WorldMeaning (existential)HistoryProtestantismScottish EnlightenmentSociologyPhilosophyReligious studiesTheologyAncient historyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Atlantic Enlightenment Rosemarie Zagarri (bio) The Atlantic Enlightenment. Edited by Susan Manning and Francis D. Cogliano. (Hampshire, UK: Ashgate, 2008. Pp. 209. Cloth, $99.95.) This volume represents the fruits of a conference held at the University of Edinburgh in 2002 to reconsider the nature and character of the trans Atlantic Enlightenment. Although some scholars continue to regard the Enlightenment as a single, cohesive movement centered in France that radiated outward to influence the rest of the western world, others have a different conception. For these scholars, there is not one Enlightenment, but many, each of which took on the distinctive characteristics of the particular locale in which it occurred. By presenting the work of geographers and literary scholars as well as historians, this volume offers a set of richly textured, multidisciplinary essays that substantially broadens our understanding of this newer approach, especially as it applies to the English-speaking North American world. In their Introduction, Manning and Cogliano are forthright about the limits of the volume. As they admit, these essays concentrate on the North Atlantic Enlightenment with a particular emphasis on Protestant, Anglophone thinkers and ideas. They do not explore the Spanish or Southern European Enlightenments or push beyond the boundaries of the British North American colonies. Even so, many of the volume's best essays do not take the meaning of "Atlantic Enlightenment" for granted; they interrogate the role of the Atlantic in producing a distinctive kind of Enlightenment thought. In a study of sailors' understandings of Enlightenment ideas such as equality and rights, for example, Paul Gilje demonstrates that the Enlightenment "not only stretch[ed] across the Atlantic, but also upon the Atlantic, reaching into the forecastle and the world of the common seamen" (180). This was an Enlightment from the bottom up as well as the top down. In a fascinating discussion of the mapping of the Gulf Stream, Charles W. J. Withers describes the circulation of knowledge throughout the Atlantic world. The Atlantic Enlightenment, he concludes, was "not a single entity but . . . a dynamic space, at once social, geographical, and epistemological. Its characteristics were different depending on where on its margins Enlightenment knowledge was made and received, by whom, and in what form and how such knowledge and its makers and audiences moved, if at all, between one [End Page 523] place and another" (47). This Enlightenment was not one movement, but a complicated set of processes that occurred in different ways at different places and times. This more capacious understanding of the Atlantic Enlightenment enables contributors to put familiar thinkers or traditional ideas into a new context. Peter S. Onuf 's insightful essay, "Adam Smith and the Crisis of the American Union," is a case in point. Using Smith's influential Wealth of Nations as the basis of his analysis, Onuf shows that the text can be read in two ways: in the more familiar fashion as a brief for free trade, in anticipation of free market ideology; or retrospectively, as Smith's historical critique of British trade policy with respect to the North American colonies. The second reading, he says, suggests that Smith was less interested in promoting foreign trade per se than in freeing England's domestic economy from the stifling restrictions imposed by a mercantilist economic system. Although conventional narratives stress only the impact of Smith's free market ideas in the United States, Onuf shows that there was more to it. Ironically, during the antebellum era the North latched onto the retrospective, historical reading of Smith in an effort to promote tariff regulations and build a strong domestic economy, while the South emphasized the ostensibly more forward-looking view, becoming champions of free trade in an effort to promote cotton and protect slavery. Other essays in the volume offer fresh insights on other Enlightenment thinkers. In a perceptive discussion of David Hume, Emma Rothschild shows how Hume's travels throughout the Atlantic world, including stays in Paris, Vienna, and Turin, and an abortive career as part of an expeditionary force bound for Canada, shaped his thinking about commerce and society, slavery and civilization. Examining John Witherspoon, an understudied Scottish thinker, Daniel W. Howe shows how Witherspoon...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.308
Threshold uncertainty score0.535

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Early RepublicSame topicColonialism, slavery, and tradeFrench-language works237,207