MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049515679 · doi:10.1111/1468-0076.00114

The prospects for the oil sector in the Iraqi economy after sanctions

2002· article· en· W2049515679 on OpenAlexaff
Imad Jabir

Bibliographic record

VenueOPEC Review · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMarket Dynamics and Volatility
Canadian institutionsRoyal College of Physicians and Surgeons of CanadaMount Royal University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSanctionsRevenueBusinessAgricultureForeign direct investmentProduction (economics)Order (exchange)Economic sectorInternational tradeDebtEconomic policyInvestment (military)International economicsEconomicsEconomyFinanceMacroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Iraq should not depend on its oil sector at the expense of the other economic sectors. This should not, however, be understood as a request to reduce oil production. Iraqi oil exports can play an important role in providing the capital necessary for the development of Iraq’s industrial and agricultural sectors, in order to increase the contribution of these sectors to the real gross domestic product. The whole Iraqi economy, including the oil sector, must be organised in such a way that it becomes open, to some extent, to direct foreign investment. Iraq should target higher oil export revenue, and hence it will be able to pay its foreign debt within 25 years at the most. The higher oil export revenue can be obtained through a policy of moderate prices and faster growth of oil production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOPEC ReviewSame topicMarket Dynamics and VolatilityFrench-language works237,207