Analysis of China’s Import from & Direct Investment in ASEAN—Based on Gravity Models
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
China and Southeast Asian nations free trade area was formally established on January 1, 2010. By the end of year 2011, China’s foreign exchange reserves exceeded 3200 billion US dollars. Trade gravity model originates from the law of universal gravitation. Domestic researchers have made empirical studies using trade gravity model of trade between China and Southeast Asian nations. There are also studies of foreign direct investment or Chinese tourist arrivals in Vietnam, using gravity model. However, neither tariff and foreign exchange reserves are taken into consideration in studying China and Southeast Asian nations free trade area, nor gravity model is used in analyzing China’s direct investment and tourist arrivals in Southeast Asian nations. Using econometrics software “Eviews 5.0” and based on a panel data from year 2000 up to 2008, this paper constructs a gravity model, the independent variables of which are gross domestic product per capita of CAFTA countries, foreign exchange reserves of CAFTA countries, squares of southeast Asian nations, and distance between China and southeast Asian nations. And quantitative relationship is made between independent variables and China’s direct investment in Southeast Asian nations, import from Southeast Asian nations, as well as arrivals of Chinese visitors in Southeast Asian nations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it