Effect of mineral admixture on resistance to sulphuric and hydrochloric acid attacks in self-compacting concrete
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a detailed experimental investigation of the acid resistance of economical self-compacting concrete (SCC) prepared with natural pozzolan, immersed for up to 12 weeks in sulphuric acid (H 2 SO 4 ) and hydrochloric acid (HCl) solutions. The results are compared with those from a control concrete and other SCCs prepared with fly ash and limestone filler. The different factors considered in this study were the effect of mineral admixture type and the strength classes (30, 50, and 70 MPa) of the concrete specimens. In total, 12 formulations were tested. Mass and compressive strength losses are the main properties investigated. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses were used to better understand the kinetics of deterioration of each type of concrete. The results show the positive influence of natural pozzolan on the behaviour of SCC under both sulphuric and hydrochloric acid mediums.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".