Motion of a spheroidal particle in a micropolar fluid contained in a spherical envelope
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper investigates first the Stokes’ axisymmetrical translational motion of a spheroid particle, whose shape differs slightly from that of a sphere, in an unbounded micropolar fluid. A linear slip, Basset-type, boundary condition has been used. The drag acting on the spheroid is evaluated and discussed for the various parameters of the problem. Also, the terminal velocity is evaluated and tabulated for the slip, deformity, and micropolarity parameters. Secondly, the motion of a spheroidal particle at the instant it passes the centre of a spherical envelope filled with a micropolar fluid is investigated using the slip condition at the surface of the particle. The analytical expressions for the stream function and microrotation component are obtained to first order in the small parameter characterizing the deformation. As an application, we consider an oblate spheroidal particle and the drag acting on the body is evaluated. Its variation with respect to the diameter ratio, deformity, micropolarity, and slip parameters is tabulated and displayed graphically. Well-known cases are deduced, the wall effect is then examined and comparisons are attempted between the classical fluid and micropolar fluid.PACS Nos.: 47.45.Gx, 47.15.Gf, 47.50.–d
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".