MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049590094 · doi:10.1109/icsd.2010.5568043

Space charge behaviour on epoxy based dielectrics filled with micro and nano silica

2010· article· en· W2049590094 on OpenAlexaff
J. Castellon, S. Agnel, A. Toureille, M.F. Frechétte, S. Savoie, A. Krivda, Lars E. Schmidt

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHigh voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDielectricMaterials scienceEpoxySpace chargePolarizabilityPolingComposite materialNano-Filler (materials)Dispersion (optics)PermittivityThermalOptoelectronicsOpticsElectronOrganic chemistryFerroelectricityChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epoxy based compounds containing micrometric and nanometric silica were prepared. These were utilized in a comparative study to establish their dielectric behaviour. In this study, the weight %-content of the silica filler was varied as a parameter. Some filler distributions were characterized using TEM. In general, the micrographs illustrate a satisfactory dispersion, showing a nanostructured morphology. The polarizability of the various materials is established and compared using dielectric spectroscopy. Indeed, the polar nature of the dielectric can affect the space charge accumulation. Space charge was studied using the Thermal Step Methop (TSM). We observed the ability of the different materials to accumulate space charges after an electrical and thermal poling close to practical applications. The influence of the combination of micro and nano filler is highlighted. A classification of the studied materials regarding their space charge accumulation is done.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHigh voltage insulation and dielectric phenomenaFrench-language works237,207