How and When Does an Unusual and Efficient Photoredox Reaction of 2-(1-Hydroxyethyl) 9,10-Anthraquinone Occur? A Combined Time-Resolved Spectroscopic and DFT Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The photophysics and photochemical reactions of 2-(1-hydroxyethyl) 9,10-anthroquinone (2-HEAQ) were studied using femtosecond transient absorption (fs-TA), nanosecond transient absorption (ns-TA), and nanosecond time-resolved resonance Raman (ns-TR(3)) spectroscopy techniques and density functional theory (DFT) calculations. In acetonitrile, 2-HEAQ underwent efficient intersystem crossing to the triplet excited state ((2-HEAQ)(3)). A typical photoreduction reaction for aromatic ketones took place via production of a ketyl radical intermediate for 2-HEAQ in isopropanol. In water-containing solutions with pH values between 2 and 10, an unusual photoredox reaction reported by Wan and co-workers was detected and characterized. Observation of the protonated species in neutral and acidic aqueous solutions by fs-TA spectra indicated the carbonyl oxygen of (2-HEAQ)(3) was protonated initially and acted as a precursor of the photoredox reaction. The preference of the photoredox reaction to occur under moderate acidic conditions compared to neutral condition observed using ns-TR(3) spectroscopy was consistent with results from DFT calculations, which suggested protonation of the carbonyl group was the rate-determining step. Under stronger acidic conditions (pH 0), although the protonated (2-HEAQ)(3) was formed, the predominant reaction was the photohydration reaction instead of the photoredox reaction. In stronger basic solutions (pH 12), (2-HEAQ)(3) decayed with no obvious photochemical reactions detected by time-resolved spectroscopic experiments. Reaction mechanisms and key reactive intermediates for the unusual photoredox reaction were elucidated from time-resolved spectroscopy and DFT results. A brief discussion is given of when photoredox reactions may likely take place in the photochemistry of aromatic carbonyl-containing compounds and possible implications for using BP and AQ scaffolds for phototrigger compounds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".