MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049630725 · doi:10.1016/s0968-8080(08)31354-8

Legal Aspects of Conflict-Induced Migration by Women

2008· article· en· W2049630725 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueReproductive Health Matters · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHuman Rights and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUnited Nations
KeywordsRefugeePolitical scienceEthnologyConscienceHumanitiesSociologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper surveys the international legal frameworks, including the many guidelines, handbooks, resolutions, toolkits, conclusions and manuals produced by various United Nations bodies, that confirm an awareness of the protection issues specific to women and girls displaced by conflict. It explores the extent to which these documents address the gendered impacts of conflict-induced migration, and the role of United Nations bodies as international governmental organisations in implementing these norms. The main focus is upon internally displaced women and women refugees. In addition to problems of enforcing compliance with existing guidelines, the paper concludes that two areas – developing strategies to accommodate the realities of long-term, even permanent displacement and enhancing women’s literal and legal literacy – require much greater attention on the part of governmental and non-governmental international organisations.RésuméCet article passe en revue les cadres juridiques internationaux, notamment les nombreux guides, manuels, instruments, directives, résolutions et conclusions préparés par plusieurs institutions des Nations Unies, qui confirment la prise de conscience des problèmes de protection propres aux femmes et aux filles déplacées par les conflits. Il se demande dans quelle mesure ces documents abordent les conséquences pour les femmes de la migration induite par les conflits ainsi que le rôle des Nations Unies comme organisations gouvernementales internationales dans l’application de ces normes. L’accent est mis sur les femmes déplacées à l’intérieur de leur pays et les femmes réfugiées. Outre les difficultés à faire respecter les directives existantes, l’article conclut que deux domaines d’intervention exigent beaucoup plus d’attention des organisations internationales gouvernementales et non gouvernementales : définir des stratégies tenant compte des réalités du déplacement à long terme, voire permanent, et favoriser l’alphabétisation des femmes et les familiariser avec les normes juridiques.ResumenEn este artículo se examinan los marcos jurídicos internacionales, incluidas las numerosas directrices, guías, resoluciones, herramientas, conclusiones y manuales producidos por diversos organismos de las Naciones Unidas, que confirman conocimiento de los aspectos de protección específicos a las mujeres y niñas desplazadas por conflicto. Se explora hasta qué punto estos documentos tratan el impacto en género de la migración inducida por conflicto y la función de los organismos de la ONU como organizaciones gubernamentales internacionales en la aplicación de estas normas. Se centra en las mujeres desplazadas internamente y en mujeres refugiadas. Además de los problemas en hacer cumplir las directrices establecidas, el artículo concluye que dos áreas – elaborar estrategias que tomen en cuenta las realidades del desplazamiento a largo plazo, incluso permanente, y mejorar el alfabetismo literal y jurídico de las mujeres – requieren mucha más atención por parte de las organizaciones internacionales gubernamentales y no gubernamentales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.688
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it