MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049652529 · doi:10.1139/v10-045

Nonequilibrium solvent effects in reaction kinetics — Steady-state solutions for the Agmon–Hopfield two-dimensional stochastic model

2010· article· en· W2049652529 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Paul Dance, Essex Edwards, Tsutomu Asano, M. V. Basilevsky, Noham Weinberg

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of the Fraser Valley
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryPhenomenological modelNon-equilibrium thermodynamicsSink (geography)KineticsThermodynamicsReaction rate constantStatistical physicsKinetic energyConstant (computer programming)Applied mathematicsClassical mechanicsPhysicsMathematicsComputer scienceQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose an approximate localized-sink approach to the solution of the Agmon–Hopfield two-dimensional stochastic model for reactions in viscous media. The approach yields simple expressions for the sink location and the reaction rate constant, easy to use in the analysis of experimental data, and allows an intuitive phenomenological interpretation of the overall process in terms of a two-step kinetic scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.678
Threshold uncertainty score0.355

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical MechanicsFrench-language works237,207