Glutamine synthetase expression in activated hepatocyte progenitor cells and loss of hepatocellular expression in congestion and cirrhosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: In normal human liver, glutamine synthetase (GS) is expressed in a rim of hepatocytes surrounding hepatic veins. GS expression is decreased in cirrhosis and increased in chronic hepatitis, focal nodular hyperplasia, peritumoural hyperplasia and some hepatocellular neoplasms. For the non-neoplastic conditions, there is limited information available on histological pattern of altered GS expression and the mechanisms of these changes. METHODS: We examined GS expression in 58 large specimens and 45 needle biopsies with a variety of non-neoplastic human liver conditions and in 12 normal control livers. Expression was correlated with clinical and histological disease states. RESULTS: We identified four patterns of GS expression: (i) Loss of normal perivenular expression was seen in states of chronic congestion, severe cirrhosis and zone 3 necrosis. (ii) Diffuse expression was seen in states with active hepatocellular injury and correlated with Ki-67 expression. (iii) Interface expression was seen in feathery degeneration of chronic cholestasis. (iv) GS expression in activated hepatocyte progenitor cells (HPCs) associated with small ducts and ductules was seen in fulminant hepatic failure and in early and late chronic liver disease and rarely in normal livers. CONCLUSIONS: Glutamine synthetase expression is increased in regenerating hepatocytes and in early HPCs prior to morphological evidence of hepatocellular differentiation. This may be the earliest marker of HPCs yet demonstrated. Loss of expression may be a reflection of disrupted endothelium-hepatocyte contact in hepatic vein walls caused by congestive injury as found in congestive heart failure and advanced cirrhosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".