Influences of principal stress direction and intermediate principal stress on the stress–strain–strength behaviour of completely decomposed granite
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The measurement and study of the stress–strain–strength behaviour of soils in general stress states involving the change of magnitudes and direction of the principal stresses are necessary and important. To investigate the strength behaviour under such conditions, consolidated undrained tests on remoulded hollow cylinder specimens of completely decomposed granite (CDG) were carried out using a hollow cylinder apparatus. Tests were conducted by maintaining a fixed principal stress direction with angle α from the vertical direction together with a fixed value of intermediate principal stress coefficient b. It is observed that the value of the friction angle decreases with an increase in α and the failure surface is anisotropic. There is an increase in friction angle with an increase in b value up to b = 0.25, and the friction angles are almost the same for b > 0.25. In addition, the behaviour of the soil in an undrained simple shear condition was examined. The simple shear condition is very near to the condition of α = 45° and b = 0.25. After having analyzed the test results of all hollow cylinder specimens, it was found that the strength anisotropy is very strong and is dependent on the principal stress direction and intermediate principal stress coefficient.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".