MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Model for Niobium Carbonitride Precipitation in Ferrite

2003· article· en· W2049683473 on OpenAlexaff
Philippe Maugis, Mohamed Gouné, P. Barges, D. Dougnac, Daniel Ravaine, M. Lamberigts, Tadeusz Siwecki, Y. Bi

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials science forum · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrostructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
Canadian institutionsLarus Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNiobiumMaterials scienceNucleationPrecipitationDissolutionTransmission electron microscopyFerrite (magnet)ThermodynamicsMetallurgyChemical engineeringComposite materialNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have constructed a computer model for the precipitation kinetics of niobium carbonitrides in ferrite. The model describes the time evolution of each age-class of precipitates. This procedure allows for the full coupling of the physical laws for nucleation, growth and coarsening phenomena. The originality of this work is to take into account the composition evolution of the precipitates with time, thus allowing for the prediction of both effects of carbon and nitrogen in solid solution. Specific techniques such as chemical analysis after selective dissolution and transmission electron microscopy with electron energy loss measurement (TEM-EELS) have been used for a thorough investigation of the precipitation state. Time, temperature and composition dependence have been explored. The measured precipitate composition, size and number of particles compare satisfactorily with the calculated values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials science forumSame topicMicrostructure and Mechanical Properties of SteelsFrench-language works237,207