FIR model identification of multirate processes with random delays using EM algorithm
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The motivation for this article comes from our development of soft sensors for chemical processes where several challenges are encountered. For example, quality variables in chemical processes are often measured off‐line through laboratory analysis. Collection of samples and subsequent analyses inevitably introduce uncertain time delays associated with the irregularly sampled quality variables, which add significant difficulty in identification of process with multirate (MR) data. Considering the MR system with random sampling delays described by a finite impulse response (FIR) model, an Expectation–Maximization (EM)‐based algorithm to estimate its parameters along with the time delays is developed. Based on the identified FIR model, two algorithms are proposed to recover the approximate output error (OE) or transfer function model. Two simulation examples as well as a pilot‐scale experiment are provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods. © 2013 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J , 59: 4124–4132, 2013
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it