Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’une des caractéristiques essentielles de la philosophie d’Henri Bergson tient dans son refus d’entrer dans ce mode de systématisation de la pensée qu’est la dialectique. Au delà de son apport déterminant sur une ontologie dérivée de la durée, ou encore sur l’inscription de l’intuition comme sens initial propre à dé-substantialiser toute forme de dualisme, cet apport singulier permet de comprendre l’intérêt renouvelé pour cette oeuvre qui, de façon exemplaire, réintroduit du mouvement dans un être-pour-la-liberté auquel nulle négativité ne vient conférer sa raison d’exister. Cet article propose de retrouver comment Henri Bergson entreprend de se situer hors de la dialectique en interrogeant le renversement, tout à la fois discret et démiurgique, qu’il effectue du thème de l’ombre. À travers cette réfutation implicite du mythe fondateur de la caverne, nous le voyons ainsi conférer à la vie mécanique sa pleine valeur de vie aliénée.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".