MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049711509 · doi:10.1080/10402381.2015.1014582

TMDL reevaluation: reconciling internal phosphorus load reductions in a eutrophic lake

2015· article· en· W2049711509 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Alan D. Steinman, Mary E. Ogdahl

Bibliographic record

VenueLake and Reservoir Management · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAlberta Water Research Institute
KeywordsTotal maximum daily loadEutrophicationEnvironmental sciencePhosphorusWater columnHydrology (agriculture)SedimentWatershedComputer scienceEcologyNutrientChemistryGeologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) are assigned to impaired waterbodies and provide a prescription for recovery. It is implicit that both the existing conditions and targets identified in a TMDL are based on credible and accurate information, ensuring that management actions directed to recovery are appropriate and effective. We evaluated the TMDL for phosphorus in Bear Lake, Michigan, to assess if the prescribed reduction was appropriately based on existing annual internal loads. We developed 5 different annual internal load scenarios based on phosphorus release rates from laboratory-based sediment incubations and diel dissolved oxygen measurements, ranging from very conservative to very liberal estimates of phosphorus release. The most realistic scenarios indicate that the previously established TMDL for internal phosphorus loading is 3–7 times greater than what actually occurs in Bear Lake. Based on our assessment, Bear Lake is likely already meeting the TMDL internal loading target, without the implementation of any management action. Thus, management efforts aimed at reducing the water column phosphorus concentration to reach the TMDL target should instead be directed at controlling the external phosphorus load.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLake and Reservoir ManagementSame topicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsFrench-language works237,207