MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049715327 · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02020-3

Failure of methotrexate and internal iliac balloon catheterization to manage placenta percreta

2002· article· en· W2049715327 on OpenAlexaff
Kimberly Butt

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetrics and Gynecology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal and fetal healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal iliac arteryPlacenta PercretaHysterectomyPlacentaUterine artery embolizationEmbolizationPlacenta DiseasesMethotrexateSurgeryPlacenta previaObstetricsPlacenta accretaRadiologyPregnancyFetus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Placenta percreta is a rare but potentially lethal condition. Previously described conservative measures to avoid life-threatening hemorrhage and preserve fertility include use of methotrexate and uterine artery embolization. CASE: A woman with suspected placenta percreta diagnosed on ultrasound in the second trimester was delivered by classic, fundal cesarean at 30 weeks' gestation for bleeding and premature rupture of membranes. The placenta was left in situ, and she was treated with methotrexate. Postpartum bleeding 1 week later was managed by internal iliac balloon catheterization and manual transcervical removal of the placenta, which resulted in hysterectomy and required massive blood transfusion. CONCLUSION: Placenta percreta managed conservatively with methotrexate and internal iliac balloon catheterization resulted in serious morbidity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObstetrics and GynecologySame topicMaternal and fetal healthcareFrench-language works237,207