MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049718291 · doi:10.1167/5.8.179

Accessibility of spatial channels

2010· article· en· W2049718291 on OpenAlexaff
Robert F. Hess, Y.-Z. Wang, C. H. Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vision · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicComplex Systems and Time Series Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrowbandStimulus (psychology)Spatial frequencyComputer scienceBandwidth (computing)Gaussian noisePassbandAcousticsArtificial intelligenceComputer visionSpeech recognitionMathematicsPhysicsOpticsTelecommunicationsBand-pass filterPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose. It is now well accepted that the early stages of visual processing comprise mechanisms that are relatively narrowband for spatial frequency (1 octave) and orientation (30°). It is less clear whether the outputs of these narrowband mechanisms can be individually accessed by later stages of perception. We address this question using elementary, local motion and stereo tasks. Methods Our stimulus comprised a disc containing fractal noise embedded in a field of fractal noise. The fractal noise in the disc was spatially displaced between eyes/frames resulting in either a near/far disparity task or a left/right motion task. The noise was stochastically filtered (amplitudes unaltered, just phases scrambled outside passband) using idealized filters of variable bandwidth and peak spatial frequency. In this way a band of correlated information was preserved with uncorrelated information at higher and lower spatial frequencies (a notched filter of signal correlation). Phase scrambling involved either spatial frequencies or orientations of noise components. We used a simple Gaussian signal/noise model to derive the minimum spectral region that subserved our tasks. Results Similar results were found for the stereo and motion tasks. In either case the minimum bandwidth necessary to accomplish these tasks was many times previous estimates of the bandwidth of early visual mechanisms. In fact it closely corresponded to the spatial frequency and orientation spectrum of the stimulus, suggesting that all stimulus information was necessary. Conclusion For both local motion and stereo, there is no individual access to information from narrowband channels tuned to either spatial frequency or orientation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of VisionSame topicComplex Systems and Time Series AnalysisFrench-language works237,207