Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Data from the Dionisio Point site on Galiano Island in the southern Strait of Georgia, Canada is used not only to document aspects of life at the site but also to consider how people made use of the coastal landscape. Central to this endeavor is the goal of tackling social questions, particularly those with implications for group interaction within the region. I examine the history of Dionisio Point using the results of recent zooarchaeological work and integrating our knowledge of social life at the site with seasonal land use patterns. I suggest that we can best explain the zooarchaeological results from House 2 by interpreting Dionisio Point as an aggregate village not dissimilar to known ethnographic aggregate villages in the Strait of Georgia. The implications of this analysis are that we can begin to see the constitution of social relationships and group identities in zooarchaeological and material culture evidence. The richness of the fauna identified from Dionisio Point together with a broad range of habitats that people residing at the site utilized during subsistence activities permits a reconstruction of the kinds of social engagement associated with these quotidian practices and their articulation with ceremonial life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".