Experimental Investigation of Coke Drum Material Behavior Under Complex Thermal-Mechanical Loading
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Coke drums are vertical pressure vessels used in the delayed coking process in petroleum refineries and oil sands plants. Significant temperature variation during the delayed coking process causes damage in coke drums in the form of bulging and cracking. In order to better understand the damage mechanisms, an experimental investigation of coke drum material behavior under various thermal-mechanical loading conditions was performed. A thermal-mechanical material testing system is successfully designed and implemented. Six types of various thermal-mechanical cyclic tests were performed: 1. cyclic thermal loading under constant uniaxial stress; 2. in-phase thermal and mechanical stress cycling; 3. out-of-phase thermal and mechanical stress cycling; 4. fully-reversed uniaxial cyclic loading with in-phase thermal cycling; 5. in-phase thermal-axial stress cycling with constant circumferential stress; 6. in-phase thermal-axial stress cycling with mean stress. Some of theses tests are similar to the actual loading scenario experienced by the coke drums. The experimental findings lead to better understanding of the damage mechanisms occurring in coke drums such as bulging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".