MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2049781010 · doi:10.1109/igarss.2014.6946684

Leaf area index retrieval study with a modelling framework, hemispherical photography and LiDARs

2014· article· en· W2049781010 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sylvain G. Leblanc, Richard Fournier

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeaf area indexLidarRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceIndex (typography)Computer sciencePhotographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The availability of experimental data from forest sites, such as foliage density, is limited and is also subject to measurement errors. To address this problem, we designed a study around the use of a modeling framework of virtual forest stands with known architectural attributes using the freeware POV-Ray [1]. The modeling framework was first used to evaluate existing methods for estimating the total plant and leaf area index (PAI, LAI) from hemispherical photography (HP) and then to simulate LiDAR data to assess the added benefit of vertical information in the LAI retrieval. LAI retrieval from terrestrial (TLS) and airborne (ALS) LiDARs were also assessed using both the modeling framework and data collected at the Matane Reserve in Quebec.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.482
Threshold uncertainty score0.959

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications→French-language works237,207→