MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049792014 · doi:10.1002/fuce.201200228

Simultaneous Determination of the Permeability of a Nafion Membrane to Formic Acid and Water

2013· article· en· W2049792014 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFuel Cells · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFormic acidMembraneDiffusionNafionChemistryConductivityAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Inorganic chemistryChromatographyThermodynamicsElectrochemistryPhysical chemistryPhysicsBiochemistryElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The simultaneous diffusion of formic acid and water through Nafion was measured for four formic acid concentration differentials (1–17.5 M) and for two counter‐ions in the membrane (H + and Ba 2+ ). An iterative method based on Fick's law is presented to calculate the volumes and concentrations of the solutions as a function of time. Besides the initial conditions, the input parameters are two diffusion coefficients, one of formic acid and one of water, which were adjusted to fit the experimental data. Once the difference in liquid fraction between the two types of membranes is taken into account, the diffusion coefficient of formic acid through Nafion appears independent of the nature of the counter‐ion and the conductivity of the formic acid solution. The diffusion coefficient of water is 10 times higher than the formic acid diffusion coefficient and is systematically lower in membranes in the Ba 2+ form than in H + form.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.241

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it