MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049793979 · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.062507

Simple model of scalar-vector interaction for the relativistic two-center problem

2007· article· en· W2049793979 on OpenAlexaff
В. В. Бондарчук, І. М. Шваб, Denys I. Bondar, А. В. Катернога

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsCoulombWave functionEigenvalues and eigenvectorsScalar fieldCoupling constantQuantum mechanicsGround stateScalar (mathematics)Atomic orbitalPerturbation theory (quantum mechanics)Scalar potentialElectronQuantum electrodynamicsMathematical physicsAtomic physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ground-state wave function and the energy term of a relativistic electron moving in the field of two fixed centers, when interaction of this particle with centers is described by two Coulomb and two Coulomb-like scalar potentials are calculated analytically by the linear combination of atomic orbitals method. By means of perturbation theory the asymptotic expansions (at small and large internuclear distances $R$) of the eigenvalues $E(R)$ of the system for arbitrary states are obtained. The dependence of critical charge ${Z}_{\text{cr}}$ and critical distance ${R}_{\text{cr}}$ from the scalar coupling constant was investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0060.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ASame topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207