MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049815366 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2010.5495262

On the use of time-frequency methods in a passive acoustic monitoring system

2010· article· en· W2049815366 on OpenAlexaff
Cédric Gervaise, Y. Stéphan, Yvan Simard

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChirpChannel (broadcasting)SIGNAL (programming language)Computer scienceUnderwaterTime–frequency analysisAcousticsFourier transformUnderwater acoustic communicationSignal processingSpectral density estimationAlgorithmElectronic engineeringSpeech recognitionTelecommunicationsPhysicsEngineeringOpticsGeologyRadar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A modern method for discrete underwater channel characterization is the passive tomography concept which takes advantage of the generated signals by the natural sources (opportunity sources). The main difficulty which appears in this field is due to the lack of any information about the received signals. In this paper, we present a method for underwater channel characterization, supposing that the received signal is a sum of shifted chirps, having the same chirp rate and start frequency. Hence, using the fractional Fourier transform, it is possible to express the received signal as a sum of sinusoids whose frequencies are directly related to the times of arrival. In order to distinguish the closed arrivals, we apply a high resolution spectral estimation method, providing also the time of arrivals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207