MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049843321 · doi:10.1002/bit.10426

Determination of biomass detachment rate coefficients in anaerobic fluidized‐bed‐GAC reactors

2002· article· en· W2049843321 on OpenAlexaff
George Nakhla, Makram T. Suidan

Bibliographic record

VenueBiotechnology and Bioengineering · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Mixing
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiomass (ecology)Fluidized bedChemistryBioreactorAnaerobic exerciseParticle sizeChromatographyPulp and paper industryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)EcologyBiologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study a simple analytical technique that determines the active biomass in a sample capable of degrading specific substrates anaerobically was developed and used to measure first-order detachment rate coefficients of acetate and phenol utilizing organisms. Different detachment rate coefficients were measured for the two microbial populations. A general relationship between the detachment rate coefficients and biomass accumulation was developed. The detachment rate coefficient was found to increase sharply after a certain biomass accumulation until it reaches a maximum, after which it decreases continuously with increasing biomass until it levels off at a constant value independent of biomass. Detachment rate coefficients measured in different reactors, operating at different conditions with respect to loading, biological SRT, and attachment media particle size, were in close agreement with each other after being normalized to the shear stress and daily methane production rate per unit biofilm area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.453
Threshold uncertainty score0.631

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiotechnology and BioengineeringSame topicFluid Dynamics and MixingFrench-language works237,207