MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049876911 · doi:10.1353/rah.2012.0001

Can These Bones Live?: Death and Life in Early America

2012· article· en· W2049876911 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John Saillant

Bibliographic record

VenueReviews in American History · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American and Latino Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitySurpriseAlienCuriosityXenophobiaSubject (documents)PoliticsAfterlifeRacismHistoryReligious studiesSociologyAestheticsArtPhilosophyLiteraturePsychologyTheologyGender studiesPolitical scienceLawSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Can These Bones Live?Death and Life in Early America John Saillant (bio) Erik R. Seeman . Death in the New World: Cross-Cultural Encounters, 1492-1800. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2010. 372 pp. Illustrations, notes, and index. $45.00 (cloth); $24.95 (paper). Death in the New World commences with the observation that at the time of first contact among Africans, Europeans, and Native Americans, ordinary people as well as leaders in arts, trade, politics, and religion were intensely curious about the deathways of foreign peoples—the ways those of other cultures buried, mourned, and remembered the dead. Deathways were seen as a clue to the culture of the alien society, not only for understanding but also for hostile strategy. In our own time, this curiosity is much subdued although not absent—which is the subject of the brief conclusion to this book. Erik R. Seeman observes that responses to alien deathways fell into one of two categories: a recognition of the familiar or a surprise at the strange. Recognition of the familiar in deathways tended toward an inclusive view of humanity (supported by biblical monogenesis), which could foster intercultural cooperation yet could also provide opportunities for inhumanity insofar as, if one understood the enemy's deathways, one could violate them effectively—for instance, by mutilating corpses or desecrating graves. Surprise at the unfamiliar in deathways tended toward an exclusive view of humanity (articulated in the birth of modern racism as a focus on seemingly essential differences among "races"), which could be and was used by Euro-Americans in establishing hegemony over Africans and Native Americans. The study of deathways yields so much valuable information because of the longstanding curiosity about funerary practices and the like (the oldest example Seeman provides is from Herodotus) and because of the ubiquity of death in the colonial world as an inevitable part of violent conflict over land and other resources, pathogens spread by human migration, and circumstances such as harsh weather, inadequate food, and overwork. This analytical framework—deathways as a window into culture as well as deathways as a tool in intercultural contact, conflict, and cooperation—is carried through a number of topical chapters. The first chapter, "Old Worlds of [End Page 6] Death," includes examples from Africans, Europeans, and Native Americans. Chapter two, "First Encounters," shows "how a New World of death began to emerge from the Old" (p. 47), as Europeans and natives began to use their knowledge of each others' deathways in violent confrontations. Chapter three, "Burial and Dismemberment in the Chesapeake," examines a fluid situation in early Virginia in which, on the one hand, both Algonquian Indians and English settlers attacked through violating the other's understanding of a proper death and burial; and, on the other hand, both Indians' and settlers' deathways changed because of colonial circumstances. For instance, Indians began to adopt some European practices, while settlers departed from European ways by using coffins, prohibitively expensive for most Europeans but easily available in Virginia because of the abundance of lumber. Chapter four, "Holy Bones and Beautiful Deaths in New France," shows that French Jesuits and native groups like the Micmac and the Huron achieved a different ratio of inclusion to exclusion than did the English and the Algonquians. There were significant parallels between the Catholics' and the Native Americans' notions of a proper death, although Jesuits were dismissive of some Indian practices, such as the use of healers and ideas about the material quality of the afterlife in which worldly goods would be useful to the departed. Still, violence erupted and deathways were modified in response, as when the settler Christophe Regnaut did something very unusual for a Christian in exhuming the corpses of two Jesuits killed by the Huron: removing the flesh from their bones and transporting the remains to Quebec, where they were (and still are) venerated as relics. The remaining four chapters treat New England, African Americans, Jewish Americans, and the Seven Years' War, generally showing the dominance of Protestant understandings of death, burial, and the afterlife, yet also the survival of some alternative traditions under the sacred canopy of American Christian deathways. By 1800, for "most residents" of the eastern third...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.794
Threshold uncertainty score0.945

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReviews in American HistorySame topicLatin American and Latino StudiesFrench-language works237,207