MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049951859 · doi:10.3402/ijch.v63i3.17738

Glucose intolerance and its relation to cardiovascular risk factors among Greenland Inuit. The Greenland Population Study

2004· article· en· W2049951859 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marit E. Jørgensen

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Circumpolar Health · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiabetes mellitusMedicineIndigenousPopulationIncidence (geometry)DemographyEnvironmental healthType 2 diabetesDiseaseInsulin resistanceInternal medicineEndocrinologyBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives. Until recently it has been a widely accepted opinion that the incidence of diabetes among Inuit in Greenland was low. More recent studies from Canada and Alaska have demonstrated that diabetes is increasingly common among Inuit, similar to global trends for indigenous people, and genetic studies have indicated that the Inuit may have an increased risk of developing diabetes and insulin resistance related disease. This was the background for the initiation of the Greenland Population Study, which was the first population-based study in Greenland where all participants received an oral glucose tolerance test. The thesis attempts to describe the prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance and the concomitant metabolic risk among Greenland Inuit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.186

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Circumpolar HealthSame topicHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patientsFrench-language works237,207