The Social Change Experiences of College Students at an Institution of Higher Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The sociology of education provides the most effective means to look into in the dynamics of education and thechanges it produces in the individual. This research uses in-depth field interviews to study the social changeexperienced by a group of college students at a private higher learning institution in Malaysia. The results reveal thatthere are four main elements in the social change experienced by this group of students. The process begins with theself-awareness by students of their social condition both in past and present situations. The second element is theiradaptability, where students come to understand how to interact with their circumstances and are able to find waysto adapt to their environment. This is followed by the third element, responsibility, where students becomeresponsible to the degree that they possess leadership abilities; thoughtfulness, independence, supportiveness anddetermination. The last element is potentiality, which is important in helping students to progress to a higher stage oflife by actualizing their full potential. These findings have identified the elements of social change in the sociologyof education in the context higher education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".