MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050005613 · doi:10.7202/1008708ar

Évolution des relations coopétitives et rationalités des acteurs dans les écosystèmes d'innovation

2012· article· fr· W2050005613 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Soumaya Ben Letaïfa, Yves Rabeau

Bibliographic record

VenueManagement international · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBusiness Strategy and Innovation
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article a pour objectif d’explorer l’engagement dans l’écosystème d’innovation des télécommunications québécois. L’engagement au sein de l’écosystème est justifié par des objectifs d’innovation ouverte et se traduit par des relations coopétitives (coopératives et compétitives). Cette recherche décrit la formation des relations coopétitives et explique leur évolution. La méthodologie longitudinale porte sur deux écosystèmes critiques (un à succès et un en déclin). Deux contributions sont proposées : une modélisation du processus d’évolution des écosystèmes en trois phases et une proposition d’une typologie de la rationalité des acteurs engagés dans le processus de coopétition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.650
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.010
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManagement internationalSame topicBusiness Strategy and InnovationFrench-language works237,207