Community-based multidisciplinary screening and intervention by pharmacists and nurses reduced BP in diabetesCommentary
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Does a multidisciplinary screening and intervention programme by pharmacists and nurses reduce blood pressure (BP) in patients with diabetes and suboptimal BP control? ### Design: randomised controlled trial (SCRIP-Hypertension [SCRIP-HTN]). ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00374270. ### Allocation: concealed. ### Blinding: blinded {data analysts}.* ### Follow-up period: 24 weeks. ### Setting: 14 community pharmacies in Alberta, Canada. ### Patients: 227 patients (mean age 65 y, 60% men) with diabetes and BP >130/80 mm Hg on 2 screening visits 2 weeks apart. Exclusion criteria included current enrolment in other diabetes or hypertension trials, institutionalisation, and receipt of medication from a professional caregiver. ### Intervention: enhanced care (n = 115) or usual care (n = 112). Patients in the enhanced care group were assessed by a pharmacist–nurse team and …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".