Characterization of the Heme Binding Properties of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> IsdA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report the first characterization of the physical and spectroscopic properties of the Staphylococcus aureus heme-binding protein IsdA. In this study, a combination of gel filtration chromatography and analytical centrifugation experiments demonstrate that IsdA, in solution, is a monomer and adopts an extended conformation that would suggest that it has the ability to protrude from the staphylococcal cell wall and interact with the extracellular environment. IsdA efficiently scavenged intracellular heme within Escherichia coli. Gel filtration chromatography and electrospray mass spectrometry together showed that rIsdA in solution is a monomer, and each monomer binds a single heme. Magnetic circular dichroism analyses demonstrate that the heme in rIsdA is a five-coordinate high-spin ferric heme molecule, proximally coordinated by a tyrosyl residue in a cavity that restricts access to small ligands. The heme binding is unlike that in a typical heme protein, for example, myoglobin, because we report that no additional axial ligation is possible in the high-spin ferric state of IsdA. However, reduction to ferrous heme is possible which then allows CO to axially ligate to the ferrous iron. Reoxidation forms the ferric heme, which is once again isolated from exogenous ligands. In summary, rIsdA binds a five-coordinate, high-spin ferric heme which is proximally coordinated by tyrosine. Reduction results in formation of five-coordinate, high-spin ferrous heme with a neutral axial ligand, most likely a histidine. Subsequent addition of CO results in a six-coordinate low-spin ferrous heme also with histidine likely bound proximally. Reoxidation returns the tyrosine as the proximal ligand.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".