MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050138443 · doi:10.1002/crat.200710927

Incorporation of surface tension to interface energy balance in crystal growth

2007· article· en· W2050138443 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCrystal Research and Technology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSolidification and crystal growth phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersCanadian Space AgencyCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsSurface tensionSurface energyDiscontinuity (linguistics)JumpEnergy balanceCrystal growthThermodynamicsGibbs free energyInterface (matter)Balance (ability)MechanicsSurface (topology)Crystal (programming language)Energy (signal processing)Materials scienceChemistryGibbs isothermPhysicsMathematicsComputer scienceGeometryMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Effect of surface tension across a growth interface is known as the Gibbs‐Thomson effect, and the associated energy balance is widely referred to as the Stefan condition in the literature, which is derived from thermodynamics. In this article, the interface energy balance that accounts for the effect of surface tension is derived by writing the jump condition for the energy balance on a surface of discontinuity which represents in crystal growth the evolving growth interface (solidification front) between the liquid and solid phases. To the best of our knowledge, the derivation of energy balance by writing jump conditions on a surface of discontinuity (interface) is new. (© 2007 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.429

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it