MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050201442 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2012.2235867

On the Tradeoff Between Spectral Efficiency and Energy Efficiency of Homogeneous Cellular Networks With Outage Constraint

2012· article· en· W2050201442 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpectral efficiencyTelecommunications linkBase stationMathematical optimizationConstraint (computer-aided design)Interference (communication)Cellular networkTransmission (telecommunications)Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Efficient energy useMode (computer interface)Computer scienceMathematicsTopology (electrical circuits)EngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the tradeoff relationship between the spectral efficiency (SE) and energy efficiency (EE) of homogenous cellular networks in which the BSs are arbitrarily distributed is investigated. The network performance metrics of SE and EE are assessed subject to a downlink transmission outage constraint in interference-limited operational environments. The EE is expressed in closed form as a function of SE, based on which the performance bounds of the network are derived. Unlike the traditional inverse relationship between SE and EE, it is found in this paper that there exists an operational regime for which both the SE and EE increase while satisfying the outage requirement, and the density of base stations (BSs) simultaneously sharing the spectrum is optimal. The difference in the performance achieved for the SE when operating in the EE maximizing mode as compared with the SE maximizing mode strongly depends on the received signal-to-interference ratio (SIR) threshold. In the SE-EE tradeoff regime, the analytical tools from microeconomics theory are applied to determine the optimal BS density with respect to the utility achieved by the network operator via balancing the SE and EE objectives. Numerical results show that, by tuning a preference factor toward either the SE or EE metrics, it is feasible to realize Pareto optimal performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.763
Threshold uncertainty score0.745

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it