<i>Research Note</i>: What can HST-GHRS Fe II observations of $\mathsf{\alpha}$ Orionis (M2 Iab)tell us about short-period heating?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cuntz ([CITE]) suggested that apparent velocity shifts in Fe II emission lines observed in Betelgeuse (α Orionis: M2 Iab) indicate that non-magnetic wave modes are relevant for the heating and dynamics of α Ori's chromosphere. This claim was based on the similarity of computed stochastic velocities in 1-D short-period acoustic wave models and velocity shifts in profile fits to Fe II emission lines (Carpenter & Robinson [CITE]), which is now identified as coincidental. While acoustic waves may indeed be important for the heating and dynamics of α Ori's chromosphere, the interpretation of the Fe II emission line profiles does not provide evidence for this possibility. The line formation of optically thick scattering lines in an extended outflow makes Fe II emission lines poorly suited as a diagnostic for small-scale structure in hydrodynamical models. Better diagnostics include electron density sensitive, low opacity lines such as C II] . In the view of these findings, we discuss directions of future research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".