Quantifying the adherence of fibroblasts to titanium and its enhancement by substrate-attached material
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Normal human skin fibroblasts were cultured on tissue culture polystyrene and on commercially pure titanium. In addition, substrate-attached material that remained on the surfaces after detachment of fibroblasts with a chelating agent was examined. The force required to detach 50% of the fibroblasts from each substrate was assessed by centrifugation. The results showed a time-dependent decrease in the force required to detach fibroblasts from titanium not seen on tissue culture polystyrene. Nearly all cells detached from the titanium surfaces at 7.85 x 10(x3) dynes/cell after 3 or 5 days in culture, whereas few cells detached from tissue culture polystyrene. Cells freshly seeded onto titanium substrates that had been coated with substrate-attached material by prior culture of fibroblasts for 3 or 5 days showed an approximately sixfold increased adherence. The results of immunofluorescence staining for fibronectin and its receptor suggest that the nature of the interaction between this extracellular matrix ligand and the substrate may be important in determining cellular stiffness at the cell-extracellular matrix interface.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".