MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050255150 · doi:10.1061/41109(373)11

Real Time Information Integration via "i-Booth"

2010· article· en· W2050255150 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lahiru P. Silva, Janaka Y. Ruwanpura, Kasun Hewage, Jamal Siadat

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBIM and Construction Integration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterface (matter)ProductivityComputer scienceProcess (computing)AutomationInformation systemPoint (geometry)Office automationSystem integrationUser interfaceGraphical user interfaceManagement information systemsInformation technologyInformation managementSoftware engineeringEngineeringKnowledge managementDatabaseOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Information has the best value when it is delivered to the correct place at the correct time in the required format. Many scholars have noted information and communication chaos in the construction industry. The "i - Booth" is a real time information management system, which functions as the hub of the real time information integration system, is a novel technology developed at the University of Calgary in 2006. The concept was tested in commercial building construction settings with positive improvements in terms of tool time, productivity, and worker satisfaction. The content of this paper includes the conceptual framework, Graphical User Interface (GUI) development, and system building & verification process of the "i - Booth". The challenges under worker, management, technological, automation, and external issues during the development of the interface of the "i-Booth" are also explained in the paper. The multi-point capability of the system is expected to enhance the integration of the design office, the construction office, and the site staff as well as improve tool time, construction productivity, worker satisfaction, and communication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBIM and Construction IntegrationFrench-language works237,207