MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050268335 · doi:10.1117/12.704717

Hysteresis-based selective Gaussian-mixture model for real-time background update

2007· article· en· W2050268335 on OpenAlexaff
Firas Achkar, Aishy Amer

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceSegmentationPixelComputer visionClutterPattern recognition (psychology)Matching (statistics)GaussianFrame (networking)Component (thermodynamics)Overhead (engineering)Mixture modelAlgorithmMathematicsRadar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a novel Mixture of Gaussian (MOG)-based real-time background update technique. The proposed technique consists of a new selective matching scheme based on the combined approaches of component ordering and winner-takes-all. This matching scheme not only selects the most probable component for the first matching with new pixel data, greatly improving performance, but also simplifies pixel classification and component replacement in case of no match. Further performance improvement achieved by using a new simple and functional component variance adaptation formula. Also in this technique, the proposed new hysteresis-based component matching and temporal motion history schemes improve segmentation quality. Component hysteresis matching improves detected foreground object blobs by reducing the amount of cracks and added shadows, while motion history preserves the integrity of moving objects boundaries, both with minimum computational overhead. The proposed background update technique implicitly handles both gradual illumination change and temporal clutter problems. The problem of shadows and ghosts is partially addressed by the proposed hysteresis-based matching scheme. The problem of persistent sudden illumination changes and camera movements are addressed at frame level depending on the percentage of pixels classified as foreground. We implemented three different state-of-the-art background update techniques and compared their segmentation quality and computational performance with those of the proposed technique. Experimental results on reference outdoor sequences and real traffic surveillance streams show that the proposed technique improved segmentation accuracy for extracting moving objects of interest compared to other reference techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.807
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsFrench-language works237,207