MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050269976 · doi:10.1134/s003317320801013x

Internet expert panel for interdisciplinary problems

2008· article· en· W2050269976 on OpenAlexaff
V. A. Marichev

Bibliographic record

VenueProtection of Metals · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicnanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe InternetExpert systemComputer scienceWork (physics)Order (exchange)Data scienceInternet researchWorld Wide WebEngineeringArtificial intelligenceBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this work is an evaluation of Internet and Worldwide web not only as the sources of scientific information but also as a prospective way for considering and solving the interdisciplinary problems. In order to give this evaluation quantitative character, the notions of “Expert Panel” and “Internet Expert Panel” were analyzed using some selected search engines and databases. Using the real example: “surface tension of solids” as a typical case of intersect of many natural sciences, we demonstrated the possibility of creating the virtual “Online Internet Expert Panel” for solving the interdisciplinary problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.374
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.144
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.143 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProtection of MetalsSame topicnanoparticles nucleation surface interactionsFrench-language works237,207