Violence conjugale et paternité : les défis de l’intervention sociale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article présente les résultats d’une recherche qualitative visant à comprendre comment les intervenants intègrent le concept de paternité dans les groupes de thérapie pour les hommes aux comportements violents. Des groupes de discussion et des entrevues semi-dirigées ont été effectués auprès d’intervenants dans trois organismes au Nouveau-Brunswick et au Québec. Selon l’analyse des données recueillies, la prise en compte de la paternité des hommes représente un défi pour ces intervenants. Les difficultés qu’éprouvent de nombreux hommes (non-reconnaissance de leur violence, expériences de violence lors de l’enfance, frustrations en lien avec les systèmes et problèmes de toxicomanie ou de santé mentale), le manque de temps, d’outils et de formation pour les intervenants, les questions de sécurité, et les normes culturelles et représentations sociales de la violence conjugale, compliquent l’exploration de la paternité dans le cadre des groupes d’intervention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.047 | 0.057 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.028 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".